While true (LNG terminals are designed to have a life of no less than 25 years), the sunken cost of the terminal does not need to be high. The decision is between:
- Flat-bottom tank customs build at the site, thus unmovable
- Cryogenic vessels, highly movable
If you need 10,000 cbm a month, why build a 30,000 cbm terminal, with a tank you are not going to need for the next ten years?
Why not a 12,000 cbm terminal, that you can grow 1,000 cbm at the time and unscrew them in 10 years when you build your 30,000 cbm terminal? (you will probably pay for the 30,000 with the sale of the cryogenic tanks)